WHAT’S YOUR ANSWER?
Below are ten easy to answer questions that most preachers are afraid or unqualified to ask. EZEKIEL3 is not only qualified, but bold enough to ask everyone to read and respond to these life changing questions. Read them and get the answers right before you get to the Judgement Seat of Jesus Christ. Who knows, if you answer them wrong you may bypass the aforementioned judgement and go straight to the White Throne Judgement.
THANKS for this excellent chart. Hope you do not mind, I pasted a copy to the homepage of EZEKIEL3 for all my readers. Can’t help but wonder what the naysayers will have to say. Oh well. Bro. Ray
Joh_1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Jesus is THE WORD of GOD, made flesh to dwell among us, the only begotten!
2Co 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
2Co 11:4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
So then there is another false Jesus, false word, another gospel, hum?
1Jn_4:9 In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.
Only begotten son = One Jesus = One true Word. It is just so simple that even a child could get it, Hey wait a minute, our Lord considers us His children. I for one am glad that He keeps it this simple for us, His children. At least for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Psa 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Psa 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
The Word is preserved FOREVER, Thank goodness! Notice it say’s “from this generation forever” not “for this generation only”. This is for those who want to say that only the originals were inspired and inherent. You (man) are not in control of God!!!
And again, the scriptures are true when they say;
Tit 1:15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
Tit 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Now who wants to argue with God? Do you think for ONE MINUTE THAT YOU HAVE MORE POWER AND CONTROL THAN GOD? What frustrates me is that so-called Christian’s will turn around and deny the power of God!!!!
In Fact the scriptures say,
1Co 8:2 And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.
I will believe in the SIMPLICITY OF CHRIST;
Gen 15:6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
All through the scriptures, it speaks of there being two seeds, two images, and two different fires.
One example:
Gen_3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Luk_8:11 Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God.
If you truly want too study the Bible and the texts behind them, study the Two textual lines of scriptures, and their origins. There are only two lines of texts, again, isn’t just amazing how the scriptures are true!!!
Here is a good chart to get you started,
http://graphics.landmarkbiblebaptist.net/2textlines.gif
Ray, posting a link to a conspiracy site that is near-unreadable because of its eye-sore-inducing bright blue background isn’t a response, its a dodge. Your cowardice and inability to defend your own position are pathetic. You are unable to provide reasons for your beliefs so you resort to links to conspiracy kook sites. Very sad indeed.
Ray, you’ve decided to tuck tail and run. Everyone who reads this will see your position is untenable in the face of the facts. You’ve utterly failed to defend your views in any shape or form. That’s why views like yours are becoming rapidly extinct. You are unable to defend or preserve them in any way.
h.gual: The Bible (AV1611 of course) teaches me to rebuke a fool in his folly lest I be like him (you of course). Then in part B of the same verse it warns, rebuke not a fool in his folly lest I be like him (you of course). I have tried to help you and Charles from stufffundieslike.com on several occasions. At best others can learn from your continuous ranting about things you as a reprobate know nothing about ,that would be part A. Part B would not be answering any more repetitive questioning from you and your cohorts from Darrell the Squirrel’s blasphemous website ( stufffundieslike.com ). What I have said, I have said; so if you have more endless questions about this post you can find the truth by reading it again. Bro. Ray
Ray, you still have not responded to me here. Is it because you can’t?
Charles: Because there might still be some hope for you and to further educate my readers about your personal deceptions allow me to recommend this site.
http://www.moresureword.com/LXXHOAX.htm
So the truth is the Septuagint is a figment of our imagination? I cannot believe that even you would believe that Ray. I can’t believe that you would go so far as to deny somethings existence to confirm your doctrinal heresy.
Dr. Sam Gipp? Doctor of what? Anybody can receive an honorary doctorate from some churches basement. Why do the majority of IFB preachers preach against the education system, and yet proudly flaunt their “doctorates” from unaccredited church schools (sometimes not even schools at all!)
Bro. Ray, I’m the one here who is actually defending what I believe. You can’t even give an argument for your faith in the KJV. YOU are the one hiding behind insults, lies, conspiracy theories, and illogical statements. Your cowardice is both hostile and pathetic. Wake up, smell the roses, and realize that you have no clue what you are ranting about.
If my arguments were really so easy to disprove, you’d be able to do it. Instead you can’t even give me an actual response. That CONFIRMS that I’m RIGHT.
Just saying that we are wrong doesn’t make it so. In intelligent, adult discussions you actually have to back up what you say…
Tim: See my response to h.gual. You are WRONG! You flunked this QUIZ. Spout off some more unbelief so I can expose you for a fraud. Let’s hear it. Ready set GO!!!! Bro. Ray
Tim: See my response to h.gual. You are WRONG! You flunked this QUIZ. Spout off some more unbelief so I can expose you for a fraud. Let’s hear it. Ready set GO!!!! Bro. Ray
h.gual: You can hide behind a made up name and intellectual babble, but you can still be seen peeking from behind the wall of unbelief. You boys and girls over at stufffundieslike.com can whimper and fuss all you want but truth is truth no matter what at the end of the day. The reprobate mind (yours) is strange thing. Bro. Ray
I should have known you’d turn to conspiracy theories next. Non sequiturs and insults alone weren’t doing the trick, huh?
Did Jesus and the apostles quote from the Septuagint? NO, unequivocally, absolutely NO. The Septuagint is a great HOAX. In the words of Dr. Samuel Gipp – The LXX is nothing more than a figment of someone’s imagination. The Septuagint represents PERFECTION in FRAUD, obviously intended to deceive, and cause doubt regarding the INTEGRITY of the Word of God. Brethren, those who would be truly wise, will know that God DID KEEP HIS PROMISE of Psalm 12:6-7, and learn to read, think, speak and DO the KING’s English as God provided in the KJV Holy Bible. Jim Searcy
The Septuagint is a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible (i.e. the Christian “Old Testament”), which was written approximately 200 to 300 years before Jesus Christ in Egypt. The existence of the translation speaks to the influence of Greek culture by means of Hellenization, via Alexander the Great, upon the ancient Israelites.
The word “septuagint” is Latin and means “translation of 70 [interpreters].”
The translation wasn’t referred to as “the Septuagint” until approximately 400 years after Christ.
In literature the Septuagint is often abbreviated “LXX,” which is the Roman numeral 70.
She is in no danger if she has faith in Christ for her salvation. The KJV itself teaches this.
One’s view of the KJV is inconsequential. It won’t determine whether you go to heaven or hell.
1: Ridiculous ad hominems that have nothing to do with the original point made here. You are dodging the argument and resorting to insults rather than logic. That is both sad and desperate. 2: I answered about those words. Those words don’t exist in a vacuum, nor do they lack a relation to the Word of God, the logos, the eternal Son. You can’t discuss one facet of divine revelation without placing it in the context of the other. You can’t speak of Scripture apart from Christ. Attempting to limit revelation to its propositional forms without viewing it in its proper dimension of depth is mistaken. 3: This is wrong. Look it up. The date was 200 to 300 years before the apostles, not after. 4: This is a dodge. When you don’t know how to answer my argument, do you simply come up with something unrelated out of desperation? Answer my original theological argument if you can. If you can’t, what’s the point of responding? 5: The Word that will be preserved forever is the Son of God. We will have no need of Scripture when we see him face to face. This is why we worship Jesus and not the Bible. Don’t turn the Bible into an idol. 6: Your view is that God has preserved the KJV but not his church? That God doesn’t work in his church to sanctify it? This doesn’t match Paul’s view of the church as a bride being purified, or as a temple being made holy. My church doesn’t use rock and roll or whatever that other stuff was you referred to. You think you know me but you don’t, so you make up stuff. Again, desperate. 7: This is not only incorrect, but has nothing to do with my point. I said you made an illogical argument. You respond with something unrelated? Why didn’t you show how your argument was logical? Could it be because it was indeed a non sequitur? 8: Ad hominem, both unverifiable, unproven, and baseless. 9: This was a logical argument that you chose to hide from rather than respond to. That smacks of cowardice. Be a man and respond with an actual argument rather than with insults. 10: The English language is not the universal language of the world. Have you ever been to a different country? I’ve been to several.
Prove me wrong. You know the difference between BC and AD right?
h.gual: You are WRONG.
h.gual: I now have responded to all your comments, check it out. Bro. Ray
h.gual: 1.The wide range of texts you now have is the perverted Westcott and Hort text they received from the Great Whore (Roman Catholic Church). These men, Westcott and Hort were Satanists and drunkards and at least one was a sodomite. 2. This discussion is about “words” that God gave to man (Psalm 119 all of it). 3.Liar, the Septuagint was made 200 to 300 years after the apostles deaths. 4. You do not even believe the Bible in the originals if you had them, your God is not of the Bible, but of the wicked imagination of your heart. 5.God said he would preserve his word forever and God the Son said I have given them thy word. 6. Modern Bible denying church is sanctified is it? Rock and Roll, familiar spirits, laughing spirit and Bible denying reprobates like you do not make for sanctification. 7. The Body of Christ is all of Christ’ churches which are local assemblies. 8.You’re partially right, God did not lose the Bible, men like you are choosing to ignore it. 9. Your ignorance is showing. 10. Do you research, the English language is the universal language of the world is all that was stated or meant from that statement. You, h.gual, are being messed with. You decided to mess with God’s book (AV1611) and now God is messing with your mind (Rom. 1) Best wishes, Bro. Ray
Hate to answer for him, but it was translated 300-200 BC–not AD. The apostles had plenty of time to be able to go through it seeing as they all could have only been born after 100 BC.
Ray, if the rest of my comment is nonsense and lies, it should be pretty easy for you to refute, right? I look forward to your response.
Ray, you have that backwards. The Septuagint was formulated at least 200 to 300 years before Christ, not after. Thus, it had been around for centuries at the time of the apostles.
Why are you are hiding? And you’re right only Jesus can straighten you out and that will be by his FINAL AUTHORITY (AV1611 of course). Bro. Ray
You sound bitter. Bro. Ray
Charles: WELCOME BACK! I missed you, seriously. Bro. Ray
What do you think about my Bible study on Dispensations so far, more to come.
#3 The Septuagint was formulated 200 to 300 years after the apostles died. How in the name of Benny Hinn, Kenneth Copeland. Oral Roberts and Ernest Angley could they quote from something that didn’t exist and they had never seen?
Answer my above question before I answer or address any more of your nonsense and lies. Bro. Ray
Stoveman:
#1 You say God is your final authority, fine, but how does he communicate his final authority to you? Where did I claim to worship the AV1611 Holy Bible?
#2 Ah! You lie. The translators said they had one more PERFECT TRANSLATION! Read it and get back to me.
You must answer me and apologize for lying on and about these men of God on this blog or I answer no more of your nonsense questions and accusations. Bro. Ray
Thank you! But do not expect a intelligent response from Ray.
Ray, you should look up the word: bibliolatry.
Still praying for you Ray.
Sir only Jesus can straighten me out, You might want to try spending more time with Him. He might help you with your condescending and mocking spirit.
You are a dead sepulchre, a person who blasphemes the Holy Spirit, you are rude. Tell me where that is a fruit of the Spirit?
I think your morbid curiosity is getting the best of you and the way of the transgressor is hard! Keep reading, maybe you will get straightened out.
Jay; Romans 1:22 says no such thing. It says “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.” (AV1611 of course). Two different statements, two different Bibles/bibles. One the AV1611 is the Bible, the other ??. I am not ignoring your comments, I will get back to you and h.gual and others that want to get in on this, then with one sweep all of you will be reproved, rebuked, and exhorted to believe the English Bible. In love of course, Bro. Ray Someone please tell Betty that I said that.
1. We don’t have the original autographa with which to provide a perfectly inerrant Bible. Nonetheless, our Bibles are more reliable and error-free now post-KJV, given that we are working from older texts closer in historical proximity to the originals. The translators of the KJV had limited resources at their disposal – we have a wide range of texts we can compare, contrast, and date, not to mention wealths of new historical, grammatical, and cultural discoveries that weren’t known at the time of the KJV.
2. Perfection is a word that properly applies to God and to the glorified state of creation, i.e. the new creation when Christ comes again. The Bible in its original autographs is inerrant, though “perfect” may not be the right word. The “perfect” Word of God is Jesus Christ Himself, the eternal logos. The Bible will be unnecessary in the new creation, as faith will have become sight, and we will be with the Word (Christ) and thus have no need of the word (Bible).
3. The apostles and authors of the New Testament frequently cited the Greek text of the Old Testament, i.e. the Septuagint. They did not write the New Testament in English, because they lived in a Greco-Roman / Judaic culture. They also frequently reinterpreted in OT in theological ways, and Paul even espouses an allegorical method of interpreting Scripture (see Galatians 4).
4. It is God’s word because it is a divinely appointed testimony or witness to the Word (Logos / Christ) of God, the primary and fullest revelation of God to man. However, God did not write the Bible word for word. He inspired the apostles through the Holy Spirit. Thus we must speak of the human authorship of Scripture as well as divine authorship. God is perfect, but human beings are not. The only perfect human being is Jesus Christ.
5. This argument is a non-sequitur. The Holy Spirit uses human beings to accomplish the will of God. Case in point: the apostles who wrote Scripture. The Holy Spirit does not inspire translations of Scripture. The question could be turned around: “Who taught you that the King James Bible was the only inspired / perfect / inerrant Bible? The Holy Spirit or man?”
6. Because the Church is continually being sanctified, growing corporately in the grace and knowledge of the truth. Thus, our knowledge about Scripture is increasing, we are able to draw upon the growing wealth of the past as well as new resources not available in the 1600s, etc. This question is as silly as asking “since you believe in the degeneration of man, why do you think cars are a more reliable and better form of transportation than ox-pulled wagons?”
7. This is another non-sequitur. No logical syllogism functions in this way. On top of this, the argument fails to take into account the classic Christian concept of multiformity. God is One God, but He is also Triune: One in Three, Three in One. There is one true Church, but this Church takes a multiplicity of forms, across different congregations, denominations, countries, etc. There is one canon of Scripture, but this canon has to be translated into different languages (not everyone in the world speaks English to read the KJV) and sometimes interpretations err because interpreters are fallible.
8. God didn’t lose them. Man did.
9. No. The Greek text is compiled from a number of Greek sources / manuscripts. It isn’t any more decietful than calling the Bible a “book” when the Bible in fact contains 66 books.
10. It was not published or preached throughout the world. Only English-speaking countries can use the KJV.
That is it insult people.
Betty: Seems to me the one of the things that stirs up your UNrighteous indignation is when someone speaks in favor of the AV1611 or corrects those who oppose it. When someone tells me that God is their final authority and have NO certain written proof of that authority, it worries me for that person whether it be the Stoveman or you. May I humbly suggest that you re-read those 10 Biblical Questions and ask yourself and the Lord Jesus Christ of the AV1611 why you do not believe in a perfect infallible Bible that God gave you. You say you cannot see the Holy Spirit in me. Dear sister, I was sealed with the Holy Ghost the day that I was born again, that’s permanent! God the Holy Ghost did not come into my room and cause me to babble in an unknown tongue, and then lead me away from the truth of God (AV1611).
Here is a bone jarring, soul shaking question for you. Just consider for a moment that the AV1611 is God’s perfect words. And you cannot grasp that fact, being led by the spirit that causes you and persons of your position to babble in tongues. What is your predicament if the AV611 is God’s word? Hmmm.
The AV1611 is God’s way and that is what I am teaching. Why don’t you write a study that tells why your favorite perversion is God’s word. Think Betty, Think! Bro. Ray
I believe you are both wrong. To speak to one another like you do. You do not have the right to judge who is going to hell and who is not. What is going on in West Virginia? Jesus saves, you did nothing and can do nothing, it is not in your hands. You blasphemy Jesus in your self determining who is going to heaven and hell. Who do you think you are? God help you. I see not the Holy Spirit within any of you. Where is He? Where did He go? Or did you go away from Him with this silly blog? How deep has your darkness gone against each other, search your heart. Jesus said to love your brother. Hate is not of God. How far away are you? I will pray to the Lord on your behalf that he bring you into fellowship with Him. My God is a God of love and justice. HIs justice only, not yours. You are not helping anyone. And you are not leading anyone to Christ. You just seem to want your own way.
What four names have I listed? I know yours because this is your website. I also saw Larry’s comment to another blog post. His comment you simply copied and pasted as your latest blog post. That’s how I know those two names.
I never put my full name on the internet, it’s not smart. But you can call me Jay if you like.
Also remember this, only fools claim to be wise. Romans 1:22
Don’t simply ignore my comments. Evaluate them. Test them. If what I speak is foolishness, prove me wrong. I await your response.
Stoveman: ‘Me thinks” the Stoveman is heated up a bit. I will address your latest 10 FOLLYS later but for now I must ask you a question and hope you have the integrity to respond. You have named at least four names including my own in your comments, what is your name, or do you want to hide behind “Stoveman”. I put my name and reputation behind every post and response, waiting. Bro. Ray McIntire P.S. Your name in English please, not Grrreeek or Hebbreeww.
Please, I need a little more explanation that “WRONG AGAIN” followed by insults. The rebuttal is lacking my friend.
1. God is my final authority. Not a simple translation of the scripture
I’ll use the 1611, which you claim to worship but do not use.
39¶ Search the Scriptures, for in them ye thinke ye haue eternall life, and they are they which testifie of me.”:
Scripture is Gods revelation of himself. Do you honestly believe that God could not preserve His word until 1611? That God had to wait until the world spoke english before establishing His word? I thought God was all powerful, able to do all things!
2. You have a very good translation of the bible. That’s what the 1611 translators have to say, not me. Take it up with them pal. I also use the 1611, it’s one of my favorite translations (I’m a history and english buff).
3. They did not have the bible in their hand! Your biblical and historical ignorance is showing. Also, if you didn’t already know, they lived 2000 years ago, and did not need to look for earlier manuscripts. They did not have to interpret/translate a language they knew. I honestly do not know how you can ask such a stupid question.
4.You failed to address my answer, try again.
5. You remind me of the pharisees, who accused Jesus of blaspheming although they had no authority of grounds to do so. How can you say that God does not use modern translations to speak to His people? You are calling the majority of the world liars, and condemning them to hell. That is a job only God can do not you little man. You are not the judge.
“11 Speake not euill one of another (brethren:) he that speaketh euill of his brother, and iudgeth his brother, speaketh euill of the Law, and iudgeth the Law: but if thou iudge the Law, thou art not a doer of the Law, but a iudge.
12There is one Lawgiuer, who is able to saue, and to destroy: who art thou that iudgest another?” James 4
6. You failed to address my answer, try again. Are you saying that God has not blessed his children with significant technological advancements since 1611? Was 1611 like the pinnacle year for the human race? Are we not able to advance past the 1611? Can we not unearth and discover historical and archaeological evidences now that we have moved past 1611? This is why I call you narrow minded. Or should I say brain washed.
7. No, you misinterpret my answer. Just because we believe that false doctrine exists, and we condemn false doctrine, does not mean that we cannot condemn your false doctrine, You see, your theology, historical research, and exegesis of the text is all lacking. I’m not sure who your sources are, but it sounds like you belong in the Ruckmanite/Sam Gipp camp. Poor scholars who got their honorary (not earned) doctorates from unaccredited (worthless) schools.
8. You asked a yes or no question, my answer was no. Deal with it.
9. The Greek alphabet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/greek.htm
http://www.ibiblio.org/koine/greek/lessons/alphabet.html
That was simple. The alphabet is taught in any standard greek 101 class. I can even put it to song if you would like!
10. Ecumenical? What? You know what happens when we assume Ray, Dont’cha?
Also, I will not believe a word you say about the 1611 until you at least start using it in your scripture quotations. If you believe the 1611 to be the perfect, infallible word for word bible for mankind, than you would use the 1611. Not today’s revised kjv. Especially since you believe that man has not progressed in any way since 1611. Good luck on learning how to speak old english!
Stoveman: My boy, my boy, my boy. YOU FLUNKED this little test, BIG TIME. Short on time this morning, but let me address a few of your Wrong Answers.
Question 1. Wrong Answer. You condemned yourself when you said no Bible is perfect, therefore you have no Final Authority in your life. Even the Jesus you say you serve can change from day to day as Zondervan sees fit. Quit lying, liar.
Question 2. Your right you do not have a perfect Bible in those babbles you read. I on the other hand have a perfect copy of the “words” of God for the English speaking people.
Question 3. The heart of the question was “did they correct the copy they had in their hand by the originals they had never seen.
Question 4. Yes God did create everything perfect, remember He said it was good and He also said His word was perfect. Paul warned us of wolves like you who would pervert the word of the Lord. Sin stained creation. And unbelievers like you are making an attempt to foul up God’s words, but alas, the word of the Lord (AV1611 of course) endureth forever.
Question 5. Your answer was God taught you the AV1611 was not his perfect word. Wrong. The Holy Ghost of God did not teach any man in the last four centuries any such thing. You my boy, are a blasphemer. As to my being arrogant, judgmental, and narrow minded in your opinion. As to arrogant, I like to think I’m confident in the Final Authority of God (AV1611 of course) which you and apostates like you do not have. As to being judgmental, Scripture (AV1611 of course) teaches the righteous man judgeth all things. As to being narrow minded, Yes, I believe God has given us his words (AV1611 of course). An I agree, we do not know the same God, I know the God of the BIBLE (AV1611 of course).
Question 6. So you think man is getting better, you must be one of those Kingdom builders who does not believe in the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ after the Great Tribulation.
Question 7. WRONG AGAIN! One would think you could get at least one question right, but it seems Bible ignorance is running amuck. So you admitted in in your essay answer to this question that you believe FALSE DOCTRINE, you’re making this too easy! Seventh Day Adventists got their devilish foothold in the late 1800’s of early 1900’s. Be careful your Bible ignorance is showing.
Question 8. WRONG AGAIN! based on your previous statements and lack of explanation.
Question 9. WRONG AGAIN, you are being deceitful because you cannot say the Greek or Hebrew alphabet let alone read Greek and Hebrew. No, you should not say what the Greek says because you cannot read GREEEKKKK! Dummy.
Question 10. YOU blew it again bible babble boy! I preach the Jesus of the Bible (AV1611 of course). By the way, what was that you claim to have destroyed? You have flunked a simple test that a 4th grader in a Bible-believing church could have passed with 100%. You got a be 0/goose egg on this simple test. My advice to you is, “Pull up your ecumenical pants because the hind side of your Bible ignorance is showing. Bro. Ray
1. No Bible is perfect. It’s completely authoritative, but not perfect. We do not have 1 original copy of any of the 66 books of the bible, and that’s ok. We do not have to have the original, word for word book. Surely you realize that languages change over time. Translation is necessary. Even the KJV translators knew that. And that’s why the KJV you read is not the 1611. Every scripture you have quoted on your blog comes from the revised KJV. Why are you so hung up on this?
2. No, and neither do you.
3. Why would Jesus and the apostles need to say that? Do you honestly believe they carried a bible around with them? Jesus and his disciples did not need to translate the very language they spoke (or knew, ie:Hebrew.) Surely you know that Peter, Paul, James and John actually wrote most of the New Testament. If you know this, why are you asking such a ridiculous question?
4.Let me answer your question with a question: since you were created by God, would you consider yourself perfect? How about creation, is it perfect? It was created by a perfect God, right?
5. God. Now let me ask you: who taught you that the King James translation is the only true bible? Also, who taught you to be arrogant, judgmental and narrow minded? Surely it was not the God I have come to know.
6. How are men less qualified? Especially when we have manuscripts that predate the Textus Receptus, manuscripts the 1611 translators would have loved to have! Who said I believed in the degeneration of man? Your question proposes an assumption, an attempt to set up the reader. Nice try.
7. Because it is wrong. Just because we believe in false doctrine does not mean we cannot condemn your false doctrine. Once again, a ridiculous question. Because the KJV doctrine is a relatively new one, created by 7th day Adventists and strangely held on to by radical fundamental denominations. Because the 1611 translators did not believe their work to be “the final, authoritative, word for word, perfect translation of God.” If they did not believe it, if they saw their work as a translation, why don’t you? You really need to study up on this. Because all of the claims Ruckmanites make have been completely and utterly debunked and refuted.
8.No.
9. No, and please explain yourself. How are we being deceitful by quoting the greek? Should I say “Here’s what the greek TEXTS say” when I am quoting one particular word in the greek?
10. Your claim is unfounded. I would love to see your research on the doozy. Are you God? How do you know which translation has “saved” more people? I think all translations contain John 14 “I am the way and the truth and the life. No man comes to the Father except through me.”
Did Jesus save you, or your bible? Should we wait 400 years before we trust any translation of the bible? Should I read the Geneva or Wycliffe bible, since they predate the 1611?
Satan gains ground when we preacher Jesus+____________. Jesus alone saves. Not Jesus+the 1611. Sorry to completely destroy your arrogant questionnaire. Perhaps Larry can give me 10 more!